Am Montag, 20. August 2012, 23:12:14 schrieb Pandu Poluan: > On Aug 20, 2012 10:12 PM, "Joerg Schilling" < > > joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: > > > On Aug 20, 2012 8:51 PM, "Pandu Poluan" <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: > > > > On Aug 20, 2012 7:47 PM, "Andrea Conti" <a...@alyf.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > +RW *can* be erased, or else it won't be called RW :-) > > > > > > > > That said, the difference is much deeper than differing metadata. > > Among > > > > which : > > > > * +RW uses Phase Modulation, -RW uses amplitude modulation. This gives > > > > > > +RW much more robustness than -RW > > > > This is also wrong: > > > > > > DVD+RW use 817.4 kHz in the pregrove and periodically inverts the phase as > > sector start marker. This is cheaper to press (as the stamper will last > > for more > > > press cycles) but it is not as accurate as DVD-RW and you get floating > > bader > > > quality during the life cycle of the stamper. > > > > DVD-RW uses 140.6 kHz in the pregrove and in addition lans pits between > > the > > > groves to mark the sector start, This is much more precise than what > > DVD+RW > > > uses. Since aproc. 4 years, there is a new patented stamper method that > > uses > > > dints in the pregrove instead of pits on top of the land. This is as > > precise as > > > the pit on land method, compatoble to this method and allows stampers > > that are > > > as cheap as the DVD+RW stampers. There is no degradaraion of the stamper > > accuracy as with DVD+RW, even with the new modified version. > > Thanks for the technical information, although honestly, most are beyond me > > :-P > > That said, care to refute the following page: > > http://www.myce.com/article/why-dvdrw-is-superior-to-dvd-rw-203/ > > because until someone publicly refute that article, I honestly will prefer > +RW over -RW. > > (And, anecdotally, ever since I burn DVD's, I already had a stack of > failing -RW discs, while having only two failing +RW discs. I might be just > lucky, but since experience matches expectations (based on that article), > luck seems to not have anything to do with it.) > > PS: I'm not trying to start a plus/minus war; I am sincerely interested, > and will switch my preferred optical media if corrected. > > Rgds,
hm, I also had much besser results with + media. +rw and +r. -- #163933
