well i guess it depends if your using php that takes advantage of concurrency. If you dont then threads arent necessary, for apache i would recommend threads because it does make use of them.
Kevin B On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy <bi...@iinet.net.au>wrote: > why? - threads "sounds" like a good thing, but is it really if its > optional? > > Its looking like threads minus is the way to go for php as geos needs > php built with -threads - I now suspect I am going to be locked into one > way (hopefully there is one way!) once I sort out the build > dependencies. > > BillK > > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 16:57 -0600, Kevin Brandstatter wrote: > > I would suggest using threads > > > > > > -Kevin B > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, William Kenworthy > > <bi...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > > ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the > > threads use > > flag. > > > > PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they > > wont play > > nice. So if I have to go back and rebuild a whole lot of > > stuff one way > > or the other which should it be? - +threads for both, neither, > > one > > enabled ... no choice will be pain free :( > > > > Its a mainly desktop system running almost everything but > > generally > > lightly loaded. > > > > Suggestions? > > > > BillK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
