On Friday 07 Dec 2012 16:41:27 William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable. > > > > The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the > > way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new > > openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken. > > > > There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize > > 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng. > > > > When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to fix > > those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable > > directly on some arch's arch's. > > > > wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and > > we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go > > stable. Please bear with me on this. > > Ok, this is the last update. 0.11.8 fixes the issue in 0.11.7, so you > should not see any more quick pushes to stable. I take full > responsibility for the issue in 0.11.7, and will work with the OpenRC > team and QA to catch issues like this better in the future. Thanks for > your patience. > > William
Still with 0.11.7 until 0.11.8 reaches the mirrors and noticed a long list of, e.g.: rm: cannot remove '/lib/rc/init.d/softscripts/consolefont': Read-only file system with the init.d services. These messages show up straight after: * /run/lock: creating directory * /run/lock: correcting owner I have not noticed anything wrong as a result of these messages with my system on 2 boxen so far, i.e. services have started and are running normally. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.