-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/11/2013 06:07 PM, Stroller wrote: > > On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote: >> ... >>> If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit >>> for about 10 minutes afterward. >> >> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your >> server runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its >> request? > > This information is not new - it was in Grant's first post in this > thread, hence the reason I wondered if you'd read it.
*goes back in the thread* Indeed it is, and I missed it. Whoops. I assembled my understanding of the problem from subsequent posts, rather than the initial one. > > I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion - if > so, please feel free to explain why. Primarily, what bothers me is your typically acerbic tone, and that your posts often (at least to my perception) carry more pejorative than useful information. I greatly appreciate your more conciliatory tone here! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRGYckAAoJED5TcEBdxYwQ4u0IAKniOy6z8N890fi0YJPE96af BOTI8jMZ/C2Qdgbg67vHb1yXR7LW+7RYk889PKLDkd3KYIG3KP2Zf1AN9bugjxEv hiNHLLUSQhdjbuoDw1EVQCt8r1m7XbQdSRTAlVGWTf7H+MlPGR06JJRtQxCxOuIY QChGpqeQEClR84D8Ml+bg3gkybYAratm2AY+mKv2GbVXydEu6guCN/1uje73F1dJ fQO6/zQr285YrRYWGrRDM4xMosqEgubL0QDMJYHOaPtvvUE5M4wulelx41jYrD0D wtGDxq0X01qDRRYWzs5tyDGgICYSp/YvxYs6SOCx6Asd4e0UwOW00RELkMB3bMA= =40Yp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
