On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2013 11:17 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:29:54PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote: >>> <html> >>> <head> >>> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" >>> http-equiv="Content-Type"> >>> </head> >>> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> >>> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/14/2013 04:15 PM, Dale wrote:<br> >>> </div> >>> <blockquote cite="mid:51418728.7020...@gmail.com" type="cite"> >>> <pre wrap="">Also, I read that Nasdaq runs a modified version of >>> Gentoo. Do any >>> other large corps run it that we know of? >>> >>> </pre> >>> </blockquote> >>> What exactly does it mean to run a "modified version of Gentoo"? >>> Don't we all? ;)<br> >>> </body> >>> </html> >> >> What kind of crap email do you call that ^^^ ? >> > > From the headers of his email: > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo speed comparison to other distros > References: <51418728.7020...@gmail.com> > In-Reply-To: <51418728.7020...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > It's perfectly compliant. You may want to correct your mail client to > understand HTML. > > (Admittedly, it's unusual to see email clients send *only* text/html, > rather than a multipart message with two different encodings.) >
ROFL. It's called "me wrestling with thunderbird to try to remove html formatting but failing".
