Am 27.03.2013 15:34, schrieb Michael Mol: > On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> Ok... >>> >>> So, what is this all about? >>> >>> Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* >>> away, *totally* replaced by systemd? >>> >>> If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about >>> this *anywhere*?? >> >> Hold your horses. >> >> The devs will work something out; systemd is not replacing the >> udev package for all users. For the moment, it's just replacing >> the udev package for users using systemd. >> >> The problem at the moment is a spat between the systemd >> maintainer and the udev maintainer. They don't see eye to eye >> about which packages should be providing which files (and where), >> and there's also a serious miscommunication (and >> misinterpretation of historical communication) issue between the >> two of them at the moment. They're trying to get it worked out >> (via attempting cooperation or via arbitration, whatever is >> necessary), and things will settle down. >> >> In the mean time, if I read the context right, this issue should >> only affect people who are using systemd. This shouldn't be >> affecting people who aren't using systemd. > > (incidentally, to anyone who's following the issue, please correct > me if I'm wrong...)
I understand the situation as you do ...
