On Thu, Oct 31 2013, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Making things "just work" is complex when trying to juggle 6 or more
>> supported versions/implementations of python.
>
> Indeed.
>
>> We have tried to explain the magic make.conf lines in the Python user guide.
>>
>> https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/Python/python-r1/user-guide.xml
>>
>> We also try to make sure that most users never have to touch
>> PYTHON_TARGETS, etc; the default values provided by your profile are
>> set up to allow *stable* python2.7 and python3.2 to work properly.
>
>> ~arch users are expected to read the docs. ^_^
>
> I am a ~amd64 user and I just read the user-guide. :-)
> I do not see any action items for my system; but do see a large number
> of reinstalls proposed by emerge
>
> I do not change any python variables in make.conf so emerge --info shows
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7"
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_2"
>
> a recursive grep -i for python in /etc/portage yields only
> ./package.use/imaging-pillow:5:virtual/python-imaging 
> -python_targets_python3_2
>
> So I basically have the default except for the imaging/pillow business.
>
> I note that update world wants to rebuild a bunch of packages (the
> entire output is below).  Some are qt-related others involve
> PYTHON_TARGETS.
>
> Does this mean that I can let the 44 packages / 38 reinstalls update occur
> and expect a running system to result?  It is unusual, but I realize not
> unprecedented, to have so many reinstalls and I would like to confirm
> that this is expected.
>
> thanks,
> allan

I realize that I forgot to attach the list of packages emerge wants to
reinstall.  So I did the same emerge command (I always use --ask) and
they are *gone*.  This I don't understand since I didn't sync inbetween
(ls -lt /usr/portage shows nothing since wednesday).

I though all dependencies, etc are resolved locally so why would it
change from 44 packages with 38 reinstalls to 4 packages with no
reinstalls?

Could someone please set me straight?

thanks,
allan

Reply via email to