On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:29:19 +0100, Joost Roeleveld wrote: > > Unless there is already a VG on the other system with the same name. > > LVM doesn't handle VG name clashes, yet some distros still give them > > generic names. > > Not sure how others do it, but I find the following naming convention > for VGs work: > vg_<hostname>
I do somethig similar. The thing is, that naming can be easily automated by distro installers, so why do they insist on calling every VG vg_000? -- Neil Bothwick It's no use crying over spilt milk -- it only makes it salty for the cat.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
