On Monday 17 Nov 2014 22:14:47 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:55:05 +0100, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote: > > Hmm, that's interesting. > > I just checked another binhost and they clearly were kept. I don't > > know why it doesn't work with mine but it's definitely a problem with > > my system. > > They should be kept, it defeats one of the main reasons for using -b if > the old package is deleted - the ability to quickly roll back if a > package update causes problems. Are you running eclean from a cron job or > a portage env script?
Interestingly, how do you remove an binary package using portage when you no longer need it? Using 'rm -i <package>' manually? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
