On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 05:46:17 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > »Q« <boxc...@gmx.net> [14-12-16 05:28]: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 05:02:40 +0100 > > meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > > > actually the thing is: There is a plugin called "NoScript" which > > > constantly accesses secure.informaction.com, which is the author > > > of this plugin. > > > I tried a lot to block that access from inside firefox but did > > > not find a way to do so (read: _I_ did not find... ;) > > > > <http://hackademix.net/2010/07/28/abe-patrols-the-routes-to-your-routers/> > > explains the connection and how to disable it in NoScript's options. > > > > > > Hi Q, > > very interesting page...thank you! > Its the stuff I like ;) > > What is the difference between NoScript saying "the access to > secure.informaction.com is completly anonymous" and > anyone else stating this? > Since the access is encrypted I cannot check its contents. > And how is it possible to send back an answer, if my > IP-address isn't offered (that is: "completly anonymous")?
I'm sorry, I don't know. I don't use NoScript -- I just remembered reading that the NoScript author had blogged about that connection so was able to google the page.
