On Wednesday 11 Mar 2015 06:42:35 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:20:25 AM Mick wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 23:33:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only > > > good for a short while after it gets marked stable. > > > Just keyword the unstable package. > > > > So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky? > > Right. Or put emerge www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins --fetchonly on a > cron job to fetch it as soon as it's stable. I googled for it and downloaded it from a mirror. Am I correct that if the hash is not right the ebuild will complain about it, or will I end up installing a suspect package? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
