On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > And then portage did two things. > > 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that > go. > > 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit enabled. > ALARM: ABI_x86 should be set in exactly one place: > /etc/portage/make.conf and nowhere else. But, nevertheless, ABI_x86 WAS > set which broke the profile because my system cannot compile 32 bit > executables.
That seems odd, I use several 64 bit profiles here and all of them have ABI_X86="64" > Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3 > packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do > that, I need a sane profile Can't you just set ABI_X86="64 -32" in make.conf? > and to know that the person who pushed out > the changes to portage, obviously without any testing whatsoever, that > broke my system so comprehensively is tortured, executed, butchered, and > then cremated. That's quite lenient, you could have left the execution until last :) -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 7: Definite maybe
pgpbailvqOGM2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
