-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Am Dienstag, 21. April 2015, 15:37:34 schrieb gottl...@nyu.edu:
> On Tue, Apr 21 2015, Florian Gamböck wrote:
> 
> > Am 21.04.2015 um 07:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> >> It's either a bug in virtual/jdk-1.7 ebuild or more likely, stable
> >> request for icedtead-bin-7 is lagging behind.
> >
> > You are right, the stable request is still going on:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546902
> >
> > Obviously the virtual got stableized a bit too fast.
> 
> I was going to ask about this too.  I noticed that the virtual/jdk-1.7
> actually gives a choice of jdk's.  One of them
>    dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin
> does have a stable 1.7 version (indeed also a stable 1.8).
> 
> I am not anxious to switch oracle-*.
> 
> allan
> 
> 

This is a typical problem with virtuals. 

A virtual can (by definition) be stable as soon as one of its providers is 
stable. Which one does not matter, and stabilization can be pretty much 
automatic and be done by any dev. 

So, after oracle-* went stable the virtual went stable too. Now portage is 
trying to upgrade it and can only resolve that by either keywording icedtea-bin 
or switching to oracle. Which solution it ends up with differs between portage 
versions, I suspect... 

This should be improved, obviously, but it's not a trivial issue.

My personal advice (without knowing the packages in detail)- if you dont want 
to switch to oracle, just accept the keywording suggestion from portage and 
give the suggested ~arch icedtea-bin a try. Don't worry too much about mixing 
stable and testing (as long as it's only for a few packages). 

- -- 

Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer 
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVNpkzXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF
MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5C/YP/RYqNB+w+ZyK39oclbNGHSS+
mJPx1uPkYn1JR09WWkH0rpxERu0vOHxTVqntar1PRxF3/tJ7XBXhEbfa7S/Ezo+x
wQi+2rNfNzaeDFIkFR/VMyu8GK/zP1zLGedVXtbWGsThiOGVjgylNxihKKtRqqFd
RrF5NKJJ8ZqU940dVuZHcj8IPGZG2hWut/xKckDUYKcCwx+EhiOlBznF+qu62wnb
yPDYCTIRhhRfyB7vOW0IJnqtLbCXdEHTS5Ip2N9R3cGrJiwYZMXcM+uZQoL1fpkQ
x7nkthV1KzCvPsO5VsANpS1F2D1fblRHwXUAeyNmmCc1VzMgKn5d2L3uJQbxopMA
IQVKWiIYb2rG+4n6i7JFqOA0MKwh0tAoNpYiYG4BaVQW+72ydx1R1zFzMX9eYav9
d4UakgUuAp2Se902PGDaM9sdiq4gcR3Ox2tM4CGr9+DFTzr/umF92OHEGMverK12
+TeozP4vloOJ0I+p3Z89BNe4CHnv71MtlM74NEq14MmSEdABek0WFOXvBkJB6ZFR
zKPD2upcdxuaMYqJNTUGBL0uDQkfDdVIEtWcXapUGc0OL9lh8OCa/PPy0pZO5JmQ
XdqOVjaPO2mryI4UT5J8sp4mM1zmOIHIe820Tjg72ZxzJ5iwgcHooHz1r+Cd5Yt1
PT4vFCCPaMksuhY5B4QR
=x6Fh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to