On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Baums <li...@baums-on-web.de> wrote: > Am 21.04.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mike Gilbert: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums <li...@baums-on-web.de> wrote: >>> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert: >>> >>>> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already. >>> >>> Why? As long as grub legacy is working there's no need to upgrade. I'm >>> still running grub legacy, too. >>> >> >> In this context, because you can build it without having any 32-bit >> libs installed. > > That's what grub-static is for. So why would I upgrade to grub:2 if > grub:0 is still working? >
Maybe because you don't like running static binaries that were built on somebody else's system. I'm just suggesting grub:2 as an alternative.
