150427 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 27/04/2015 00:23, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> I'm not saying it can't be done, but it's deceptively hard
>> to automatically come up with a list of non-ridiculous suggestions
>> before the user in question dies of old age :  https://xkcd.com/1425/ .

That expresses the extremes well enough,
but one would hope that the Portage output problem lies between them.

> I'm aware of the scope of the problem, and I'm not asking Portage
> to infer what I might want or suggest solutions I didn't ask for.
> Besides, "what I want" is already unambiguously defined by world
> and the contents of /etc/portage/.
> I'd be much happier if portage took the information *it already has*
> and formatted its output a tad more parseable to human brains.
> Right now what it's doing is the equivalent of a core dump
> with "ah, fuck it, I give up. Here, you figure this shit out".

This expresses Gentoo users' difficulties all too well (smile).

What we are asking is for the devs to accept there is a problem,
have a proper look at it & try to make Portage output more understandable.
We are always grateful for their volunteer efforts.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca


Reply via email to