On 2015-10-08 07:50, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they > > > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of > > > the kernel tree and checkout from tags. > > > > Do you bother with the gentoo patches? > > I seem to recall the list having a discussion about gentoo-sources vs. > vanilla-sources a while ago, and I believe Rich doesn't use the gentoo > patches. It doesn't seem like he does, since just above he mentions that > he builds and runs kernels from a checkout of a git repo from > kernel.org. > > > I have the kernel tree and none of the tags say longterm, do I have the > > wrong tree or something? The url I have is > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > The stable tree is > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git. > Only X.Y tags go into Linus' git repo, not X.Y.Z. When they switched > from version 2 to version 3, the numbering scheme changed a bit. Any > kernel version with a third version number is either stable or long > term, and if the last number in the version is more than 8 or 10, it is > probably going to be a long term kernel.
They list the longterm and stable releases quite neatly on their front page, no need for guessing: https://kernel.org/ -- Tuomo Hartikainen