On Wednesday 11 November 2015 23:08:44 Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:15 +0100, Ralf wrote: >> And thinking about btrfs snapshot feature, using some 'btrfs history >> tool', i would probably only be able to see a lot of crypto garbage when >> going through my history (which can for sure be accessed by ecryptfs, >> but not by standard btrfs tools). > >That's a good point, you'd need to mount each snapshot before you could >read it. > >I *really* wish btrfs had its own encryption, but I suspect this would be >far from trivia to implement.
From a presentation [0] earlier this year I understand that Chris Mason really wants it, too, but has something else he wanted to finish first (I don't remember what, though). [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3QRWUfBua8 -- Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
