Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner. John Runyon Sent from my phone
On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > [snip] > > >>> > >> It seems I'm not the only one: > >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1034770-highlight-localmount.html > >> > >> "The problem was openrc-0.18.4. When I downgraded to openrc-0.16.4 the > >> problem went away." > >> > >> Now, I can not downgrade without eth0 working. > >> Do I need to boot strap and downgrade or is there is easier solution? > >> > >> -- > >> Thelma > >> > >> > >> > > Here is a news item that explains the situation. > > > > 2015-10-07-openrc-0-18-localmount-and-netmount-changes > > Title OpenRC-0.18 localmount and netmount changes > > Author William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> > > Posted 2015-10-07 > > Revision 1 > > > > The behaviour of localmount and netmount is changing on Linux systems. > > In the past, these services always started successfully. However, now they > > will fail if a file system they attempt to mount cannot be mounted. > > > > If you have file systems listed in fstab which should not be mounted at > > boot time, make sure to add noauto to the mount options. If you have > > file systems that you want to attempt to mount at boot time but failure > > should be allowed, add nofail to the mount options for these file > > systems in fstab. > > > > This is my fstab: > /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime 1 1 > /dev/hda3 / ext3 noatime 0 1 > /dev/hda2 none swap sw 0 0 > /dev/hda4 /home ext3 noatime 0 1 > > /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,ro,users 0 0 > /dev/hdd /mnt/dvdr auto noauto,users > 0 0 > > # Scanner > none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 > > none /proc proc defaults 0 0 > > Does it mean I should add: "nofail" to Scanner and "/proc" line? > > -- > Thelma >
