On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:04:14 -0500 Philip Webb wrote: > 160201 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:03:50 +0000 Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:56:37 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >>> Switching to nvidia OpenCL interface... done > >>> * x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is using the deprecated > >>> readme.gentoo.eclass. <<<????>>> > >>> * Please use readme.gentoo-r1 instead. > >>> What does the marked line implies? This is an outdated readme? > >> It's a QA message stating that the ebuild should be updated > >> to use a newer eclass. The readme.gentoo eclass is used > >> to generate messages specific to installing the package on Gentoo. > >> IMO ebuild QA messages like this should not be shown to users. > > The idea is that users should ping developers > > with appropriate bug reports. > > However are users supposed to know that ? > How would they know whether such a bug report really was "appropriate" ? > > Really, Portage output needs a serious re-think (smile).
If emerge outputs something strange for ebuild, this should be reported as bug, as well as any other weird package behaviour. Of course, no one _must_ report this, this is a matter of a good will. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpHqJ2igRnLX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
