On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:26 AM,  <meino.cra...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> yes the option was set for what reason ever...I will clear that.
> Next question...: Do I need v86d still then?

Probably not, but I have no idea why you even had it in the first place.

>
> Another thing which drives me crazy:
> Linux-headers!
> emerge insists of installing linux-headers-4.10. I am runnig
> 4.9.12. Unstable is globally set (~amd64).

In general I don't think matching the exact kernel version is
important, though perhaps v86d cares if you need that.

>
> But giviing
>
>     emerge sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9
>     or
>     emerge 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9'
>
> gives me
>
> !!! 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9' is not a valid package atom.
> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
>
> Even
>
>     emerge sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10
>     or
>     emerge 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10'
>
> results in
>
> !!! 'sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10' is not a valid package atom.
> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
>

The syntax would be emerge '=sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.9'

The = is critical, since that makes it an atom.  Depending on your
shell you might or might not need quotes.

Again, I'm not sure you really need to worry about it.

-- 
Rich

Reply via email to