On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 02:10:09 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > I just can't believe it. They're issuing a general-purpose tool, to > > work everywhere, and they don't test it on a representative sample of > > systems? > > It was tested, otherwise how could the conflict with kde-apps/gpgmepp > and kde-apps/kdepimlibs:4 been known? > > Upstream has merge some external libraries into its own code base and > provided an option to disable these exactly for this use case. > Adding USE="-cxx -qt5" or masking this package provides remedy for > those who still use kdepimlibs:4, both are standard gentoo procedures. > As apposed to what you present in previous messages, a "standard kde" > system may or may not include kdepimlibs:4. We delayed too much > stabilization of gpgme to allow proper resolution, however, no reason > to delay any more as no issue for these that do not use kdepimlibs:4 > and for these who use a simple USE change or mask resolves the issue.
It seems to me that this should have been handled with a news item. -- Neil Bothwick Windows Error #05: Nonexisent error. This cannot really be happening
pgpwF1QjrhUfR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
