On 03/15/2018 11:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On March 15, 2018 9:35:35 PM UTC, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com <the...@sys-concept.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've compiled the pdftk-9999 (java based)
>>> gcc-5.4.0-r4 is gone and pdftk is working as it should.
>>>
>>> Thank you everybody for the help.
>>
>> That's great news!
>>
>> Instead of removing pdftk from the portage tree because it depends on
>> gcc-5.4 [gcj], is there any reason it can't be replace by the one
>> which uses a jvm instead?
>
> Someone needs to maintain it as well.
>From the "pdftk-9999 --help"
-----quote----------
AUTHOR
Sid Steward (sid.steward at pdflabs dot com) maintains pdftk. Please
email him with questions or bug reports. Include pdftk in the
subject
line to ensure successful delivery. Thank you.
-----end quote-------
--
Thelma
