On Monday, 23 April 2018 10:52:57 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday, 22 April 2018 12:13:53 BST Mick wrote: > > On Sunday, 22 April 2018 10:21:16 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > That first thought was prompted by the instruction to "mount -o bind > > > /lib/ > > > modules /foo/lib/modules" in this page: > > > > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:X86/Chroot_Guide > > > > I didn't do a detailed comparison, but you may want to take a look at the > > Handbook, the chroot mounts appear to be different. > > I think I've found the problem. It's in the -march setting, which of course > has to be specific in the chroot, not "native." I had it set to > "silvermont," but now I can't see why I did that. The target CPU is a > celeron N3150, which according to an Intel site is "Products formerly > Braswell" [1]. None of the Gentoo or GCC optimisation sites I could find > even mention braswell, silvermont or model 76.
If you check 'man gcc' you will find "silvermont" is mentioned as a cpu_type you could set for march, but not the graphics core Braswell. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
