sorry, obviously i mis-sent that. "We the People Dare to Create a More Perfect Union" <aclu.org>
May 23, 2019, 9:49 PM by mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com: > I use Tutanota.com, they allow multiple open sessions, many people can look > at/use the same email address if they all have the email addr. and password. > I suspect other encrypted mail providers do the same. However, if it's > actually of value i'd use something more secure. You can always encrypt > documents and send them out over any old email, likely far more securely than > plaintext sent encrypted via mail server. They did have a security flaw in > the tutanota software months ago and people got into mail boxes, I've since > seen a small amount of spam (I usually get none, aggressive pursuit works!) > demonstrating again that humans are usually the weakest part of any security > system. So, how much do you trust people you haven't met? I suspect most > lawyers would agree that email is just a bad idea if confidentiality matters, > or the web in general frankly and it's getting worse fast. > > "We the People Dare to Create a More Perfect Union" <aclu.org> > > > > May 23, 2019, 9:39 PM by gtay...@gentoo.tnetconsulting.net: > >> On 5/23/19 1:11 PM, Dale wrote: >> >>> I have to deal with a State entity for some communications and they do that >>> send a link thing to go to a Cisco site to get/send emails. I guess it is >>> somewhat better than just plain open email but as you point out, if they >>> have the email with the link, they do the same as the intended recipient >>> and get the encrypted email too. >>> >> >> Some of these types of sites, most that I've used, configure something out >> of band, usually a password, such that you have to have that to get logged >> in to see the message(s) in the future. >> >> I know that my insurance, my bank, and my CC company do this. Just having >> the link is not sufficient to be able to read the ""secure message. >>
