On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> wrote: > > On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > Only if somebody has created a generator for openrc, which I doubt. > > It was obviously a semi-trollish comment. > > > Now that's harsh! Although yes I'm sure he was tweaking tails - hence > the "tongue in cheek" smiley.
I didn't intend to suggest that I thought it was mean-spirited. Just stirring the pot. > > Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because > it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to the > nix philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well". > Now, THAT is a semi-trollish comment if I ever saw one. :) That said, you could argue that the individual components of systemd do generally do one thing well. I think the criticism is more in the packaging, and that the components mostly don't interchange with anything non-systemd. Though as we can see from eudev/elogind and so on that isn't strictly the case. I sometimes describe systemd as the anti-busybox. But, I don't want to derail the thread entirely... -- Rich