On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:47:04 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> > His elaborate signature was the primary cause of offence for me.  
> 
> That was excessive too.

Not to mention pointless. What is the use of adding a message saying
"don't read this email if it's not addressed to you" where you can only
see it after you have read the email :-O


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Disinformation is not as good as datinformation.

Attachment: pgpAk_rkZP2GP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to