On 2/13/21 8:42 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
On 2/13/2021 2:41 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:

[snip]
Bumps into not having sys-apps/portage-9999::gentoo:
# $emerge dev-db/pgmodeler
Calculating dependencies... done!

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-apps/portage[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-apps/portage-9999::gentoo (masked by: missing keyword)

Portage-9999 is risky since it's VERY MUCH still developmental. BUT, if you really want it, add this to your package.accept_keywords: sys-apps/portage **

Include the two stars.  That will override missing keyword. It may be better to specify a full token rather than a shortcut. In that case use: =sys-apps/portage-9999 **

The portage-9999 suggestion seems like a red herring to me. More likely the reason the portage ebuild does not satisfy the dependency is because it is installed with different python_targets/python_single_target than what the consuming package wants.

Reply via email to