Antoine schrieb: >>>I can't change the whole world just for one list. >> >> >> No need to. Even in other mails, there's seldom a need >> for HTML in mails. > > I too am interested in useful contexts for html. I just can't think of > any situation where I wouldn't use structured text markup in an email.
Well, if you need more than just *bold*, /italics/ or _underline_. It might make a text easier to read, if important things are highlighted or whatnot. Also, links can be done nicer; eg. a long URL should be linked, but the *TARGET* isn't important but just what's written there. Eg. <a href="http://google.com/">searchengine</a> or something like that. > ps. since stopping top-posting on lists I have since stopped top-posting > *anywhere*. People who have a list of questions and answer them two > posts up without any real reference to the questions are simply poor > communicators... and that is certainly what I see a lot of. Exactly. Actually, I think that this top posting junk only came up, because a "certain" piece of crap from Microsoft didn't support threading for FAR too long. And without threading, fullquotes are somewhat helpful (and top posts most of the time include a full quote). Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list