On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:46:04 -0500, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:37 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > > Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > > > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > > > > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) > > > This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the > > > ebuild. You have it masked manually, it would seem. > > > > > > Did you leave yourself a comment as to why it was masked? > > > > Well, I got 2.33 installed on me and the system does not allow that > > package to downgarde, for good reason... I masked the old version to > > stop it from bitching at me that it can't downgrade that package. > > I don't for sure whether or not glibc is supposed to be able to be > downgraded or not. If not, then it sounds like using the ~arch version > of it is biting you in the backside. A cautionary tale about not using > the ~arch keyword for mission-critical packages unless the situation is > dire.
The chromium-90.* ebuilds apply a patch to work with glibc-2.3.3, you might try that on a 91 ebuild. Read bug #769989 first. -- Neil Bothwick Our bikinis are exciting. They are simply the tops.
pgpkMA2Wnpohi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
