hi.  i personally think gentoo should've gone to
OFTC instead of libera, because:

- OFTC is the true libera, thanks to its better
  tor support, which is not surprising as it is
  the home of the tor project.

- OFTC has more users at the moment, and is
  specifically designed for FOSS projects.

- OFTC is older than libera, with less problems to
  solve.

despite libera being called after liberty in latin,
its tor support is hypocritical, as it requires
registering SASL over an un-tor-ed connection,
hence revealing your IP address, which defeats the
whole point of tor (hiding your IP address).
OFTC, on the other hand, is the home of the tor
project, and has best tor support.  so, in a
sense, OFTC is the true libera.

the only reason that i can think of that would
explain why a group of people would create libera,
is because their /hobby/ is to maintain IRC
servers.

i'm not for freenode either.  the latest move was
unacceptable, and it's good that people started
leaving freenode, to show the new owners that
while they can purchase a bunch of servers and
domain names, they cannot purchase people.

so i like that this freenode drama happened.  but
i dislike that we solved it by creating libera.  i
think we should've solved it by going the simpler
solution:  go to what already exists, and already
has more liberty (more tor friendliness): OFTC.

but, what happened is that we -instead- went to
the freenode copy-cat, with the same hypocritical
tor support, aka libera, which is as far away from
liberty as freenode was away from free.

while this subject is still warm and in the
making, i recommend gentoo to change its opinion
ans switch to the OFTC.

rgrds,
cm.


  • [gentoo-user] why libera... caveman رَجُلُ الْكَهْفِ 穴居人

Reply via email to