Charlotte Delenk wrote: > On 9/25/21 19:44, Dale wrote: >> the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >>> On 9/25/21 2:59 AM, Charlotte Delenk wrote: >>>> On 9/25/21 09:45, Marco Rebhan wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 09:06:20 CEST the...@sys-concept.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Any idea where I can find "Master PDF Editor - version 4" ebuild? >>>>>> Ver. 4 is without watermark. >>>>> You can find it in the git repository history: >>>>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/? >>>>> id=56e7e82af65de580969758794453066a29ecbf85 >>>>> >>>>> The command I used to find that was git log >>>>> 'app-text/master-pdf-editor/ >>>>> master-pdf-editor-4*' in case you need to do that in the future. >>>>> >>>>> Due to the commit message, I don't think you'll have much luck unless >>>>> you have the source files: >>>>> >>>>>> app-text/master-pdf-editor: removed 4.3.82 as sources are no longer >>>>>> available. >>>>> -Marco >>>> >>>> It appears that the binaries for a slightly newer version are still >>>> available on the website, just under a different name: >>>> >>>> http://code-industry.net/public/master-pdf-editor-4.3.89_qt5.amd64.tar.gz >>>> >>>> >>>> I attached an ebuild that might work, haven't tested it. >>> I'm trying to test. I add to: >>> package.accept_keywords >>> =master-pdf-editor-4.3.89 ~amd64 >>> >>> emerge -avq =master-pdf-editor-4.3.89 >>> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords: >>> =master-pdf-editor-4.3.89 >>> * Last emerge --sync was 40d 23h 52m 30s ago. >>> >>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=master-pdf-editor-4.3.89" have >>> been masked. >>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete >>> your request: >>> - app-text/master-pdf-editor-4.3.89::Local (masked by: ~amd64 keyword) >>> >>> Why is still blocking it? >>> >>> >> >> >> It looks like it wants you to include the category as well in >> package.keywords. Like this: >> >> =app-text/master-pdf-editor-4.3.89 >> >> Just a FYI. I'm showing this here for that package. >> app-text/master-pdf-editor-5.7.90 I don't even see a version 4 at all. >> If what you are installing now doesn't work, you may want to sync and >> try version 5. Just a thought. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> > > Thelma was looking for version 4 in particular, since version 5 > apparently added unremovable watermarks >
Oh. That explains that then. ROFL Dale :-) :-)
