> It looks like they changed the naming between beta1 and beta2, but the > ebuild appears to take this into account. Sorry for saying thtat you are misreading the ebuilds.
I have just figured out how it works, but i think that is misleading: Unless you unmask the libkpgp package, emerge reports missing beta2 ebuild. I think that emerge instead of reporting that highest version of dep is missing, should report masked beta1 ebuild, because it matches the deprange(from 3.5_beta1 to 3.5.0_beta2). -- Best Regards, Peper -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
