Is it your opinion that this would help my situation with the multiple instances? If so I will give it a try tomorrow.
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:02, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to write: > On 12/8/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/8/05, Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 08 December 2005 10:05, a tiny voice compelled Mark Knecht > > > to > > > > > > write: > > > > The problem I see periodically is that at time the java_vm will go to > > > > 100% CPU and I have to kill it by hand. > > > > > > But you only show one instance of java_vm, right? > > > > As far as I know, yes, I only have one copy. I do not see the multiple > > copies that you are seeing. > > This could be a nptl vs posixthreads issue. nptl threads show up as > only a single process. For those having this problem, do you use > "nptlonly" for glibc? If not, anyone willing to try remerging glibc > with that flag? > > -Richard -- Regards, Ernie 100% Microsoft and Intel free 23:00:18 up 1 day, 5:33, 2 users, load average: 0.23, 0.47, 0.47 Linux 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
