Hi michael,
on Sunday, 2005-12-11 at 23:44:22, you wrote:
> Any suggestions welcome. If you want to tell me why you like it or don't
> like it even better.

www-servers/fnord is probably the smallest that doesn't do ugly things
like tux's processing HTTP at kernel level. I haven't used it but from
the included benchmarks (and looking at the code...) it seems damn fast.
There's not ebuild for the latest version but that should be easy to
fix.

regards
        Matthias

-- 
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: FAC37665
Fingerprint: 8C16 3F0A A6FC DF0D 19B0  8DEF 48D9 1700 FAC3 7665

Attachment: pgpPZkbKBBLH8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to