On 15 Jan 2006, at 19:15, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
...And if I teach them to train the filters by
dragging & dropping into the "learn" folder then I anticipate perhaps
just one of them complaining "but why can't I just right-click it and
`mark as junk' in Outlook?".
True. My answer is: "because then you'll get all the spam in your
webmail when being on business trip"
The MS answer to this is to use Exchange & its webmail, which is
basically identical to Outlook itself. I really like this level of
integration, and I'd probably be happy using it if it was open &/or
documented.
But it makes me think: Does Outlook set some kind of flag to the mail?
Does it note anything in the headers?
Good question. I'll have to do some homework so I can answer that.
In fact, lots of my users are happy with about that rate and without
learning of Spam. Bayesian filters are activated for all of them, but
they are only trained by autolearning.
SpamAssassin is currently getting about 33%, which is next to
useless.
agreed, and I bet you can improve that. You can also decide to have
all
users share your Bayesian database. So you don't have to teach them to
learn Spam.
I see... in the default /etc/spamassassin/local.cf it states:
# Use Bayesian classifier (default: 1)
# use_bayes 1
# Bayesian classifier auto-learning (default: 1)
# bayes_auto_learn 1
I guess this means that I'm in a similar configuration to yours by
default - presumably SA will start learning pretty quick.
How do I configure where the Bayesian database is stored, please?
Stroller
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
