Hi, On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 17:38 +0100, Meino Christian Cramer wrote: > From: Daniel da Veiga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] First Mail to this list: Different isos ? > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:47:38 -0200 > > > On 2/10/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > this is my frist mail to this list. > > > > > > I am on the way to install Gentoo-Linux onto my HD...but I don't > > > know what iso image to use. My platform is x86-based, therefore > > > I will use one of the *x86*.iso images. > > > > > > But there is a *2005.1*iso and a *2005.1-ri*iso. Right from the name, > > > I would choose the *r1* image. But it is very much smaller then the > > > other one. > > > > Why not simply use the "current" link? > > I would have done this already...if the image size would have been > more similiar... > The latest installer ISO's are smaller (IMHO) because they contain only stage3 tarballs (no stage-1 & 2 anymore). Haven't checked though. > > I don't know exactly why it is smaller, but you should have no > > problems with it... As the team said, its just a media refresh with a > > few bug fixes. > > > > > > > > So...is this *r1* image an update, a fix, another kind of Gentoo...? > > > > A quick google search returned: > > http://www.gentoo.org/news/20051121-release-2005.1-r1.xml ...SKIP... > > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > HTH.Rumen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
