On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Bruce Burden wrote: > > > Is it in the portage system? I did a "sync" a few weeks > > ago, and I still get the 20050502 version, > > Do an 'eix x11-drm' and see it lists a 20051223 version, keyword > masked. (If you don't have eix, first run 'emerge eix' and > 'update-eix'.) So do > > echo "x11-base/x11-drm ~x86" >>/etc/portage/package.keywords > > and 'emerge x11-drm'. > Okay, I have:
* x11-base/x11-drm Latest version available: 20051223 Latest version installed: 20051223 Size of downloaded files: 549 kB Homepage: http://dri.sf.net Description: DRM Kernel Modules for X11 License: X11 * x11-drivers/ati-drivers Latest version available: 8.14.13-r3 Latest version installed: 8.14.13-r3 Size of downloaded files: 23,186 kB Homepage: http://www.ati.com Description: Ati precompiled drivers for r350, r300, r250 and r200 chipsets License: ATI # lsmod Module Size Used by radeon 98464 0 drm 61592 1 radeon agpgart 27216 1 drm bluetooth 39652 0 libcrc32c 2816 0 crc_ccitt 2176 0 and nothing in /dev/dri, which may explain: (II) fglrx(0): UMM area: 0xc08f7000 (size=0x076f9000) (II) fglrx(0): driver needs X.org 6.8.x (II) fglrx(0): detected X.org 6.8.2 (II) Loading extension ATIFGLRXDRI (II) fglrx(0): doing DRIScreenInit drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed [drm] failed to load kernel module "fglrx" (II) fglrx(0): [drm] drmOpen failed (EE) fglrx(0): DRIScreenInit failed! (WW) fglrx(0): *********************************************** (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! * (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) * (WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) * (WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available * (WW) fglrx(0): ********************************************* * (this is from /var/log/Xorg.0.log) and, finally: [fglrx:firegl_stub_register] *ERROR* Unable to the open some already present DRM kernel module! So, what am I doing wrong? The drm module seems to be the problem child, once I added that, fglrx got tempermental... Bruce -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I like bad!" Bruce Burden Austin, TX. - Thuganlitha The Power and the Prophet Robert Don Hughes -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list