On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 02:40 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 18:51 -0500, Willie Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 04:51:31AM +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
> > > Recently i've got a power failure while one of my gentoo boxes was up
> > > and running. Since then, the users command seems not to work correctly
> > > anymore, as it claims for users to be logged in that almost certainly
> > > aren't and don't have a single process running. Besides of this issue,
> > > everthing seems to work as expected. Can anybody here tell me where to
> > > look for the source of this problem ?
> > > 
> > > Thanks, Matthias
> > > 
> > 
> > I am running into a similar problem recently. I found out that sometimes, 
> > after
> > updating 'system', init would restart. During an recent upgrade, after init 
> > restarts, the users that were logged-in at that time become "ghosts" of 
> > some sort. 
> > 'w' would show the correct number of people logged in, but some other 
> > commands 
> > won't. It might have something to do with the fact that wtmp is not 
> > registering the 
> > logouts from thost users. If I issue 'last | head' i would see something to 
> > that 
> > effect. 
> > 
> > I am wondering perhaps removing /var/log/wtmp would solve the issue (you 
> > might also
> > want to touch /var/log/wtmp afterwards). It might require a rebooting 
> > (which I haven't
> > gotten around to doing).
> 
> Well, i tried that after booting into x86-2006.0-minimal. Unfortunatley,
> that didn't solve my issuses; I found out that my system behaves after
> the following pattern:
> 
> login with user1:
> $ users
> user1
> $ exit
> 
> login with user2:
> $users
> user1 user2
> $exit
> 
> login with user3:
> $users
> user2 user3
> 
> Thus, the system seems to ignore logouts as long as there are not more
> then two additional logins.   
> 
> I've also did a reiserfschk while staying in the live-cd environment,
> but no corruptions where found ...
> 
By the way, the output of 
$ w
seems correct ...

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to