-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 16:40, "Hemmann, Volker Armin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] KDE
> version':
>> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:12, Thierry de Coulon wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21.13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>> To-day I installed kdebase using "emerge kdebase".
>>>> But the installed version was 3.4.3.
>>>> Is it right? Did not KDE reach 3.5 version?
>>> I did not sync recently but (on my amd64 machine) emerge --pretend
>>> =kde-3.5.0 shows the package are still masked with keyword.
>> which is quite sad - KDE 3.5.1 is out for ages!
>
> The KDE team is a bunch of weenies. :P
>
> Seriously, I think they hold package releases (even point releases) in
> package.mask and ~ARCH too long. HOWEVER, they are provide (IIRC) both
> split and monolithic ebuilds, which is quite a bit of work to get
> completely right.
>
>> But the times, that gentoo was pretty actual in the stable tree are
>> over.
>
> You do realize the above sentence makes no freakin' sense, right?
>
>> Is this so bad with gnome too?
>
> <sarcasm>
> What's gnome?
> </sarcasm>
>
Just a note: KDE dev don't decide whenever it becomes to ARCH instead
of ~ARCH, that is an ARCH gentoo maintainers. They are supposed to be
the ARCH specialists. When they think some app is stable in their ARCH,
it will be moved to ARCH from ~ARCH.
But if you wanna have the latest packages, just ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~ARCH"
where ARCH is your computers' architecture. Maybe your system will be a
little more unstable, but from my point of view, it is still stable
using ~x86 (mine haven't broken yet).
Bye !!
Rafael Fernández López.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEI1Qc9RRlaicc3IERAt6vAJ4wk9jf6jFgzHTb9ZS1dXSLxxiWsQCcDVLJ
NGm98P+IE3BgyRIIP1JWjK0=
=SL08
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
