On Monday 03 April 2006 04:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: > > I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. > > If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default > > runlevel. > > There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 > > I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically > corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when > it isn't. On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:30:20 +0200, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: > >> I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. >> If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default >> runlevel. > >There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 > >I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically >corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when >it isn't. Thanks. I've updated the bug, and added another with a reference, since I couldn't figure out how to re-open 113755. Now, will this post using Agent and Wine? If it double posts, I apologize. Peter -- "I only hope to read this in the future" - Peter Kelly -- I read the newspaper avidly. It is my one form of continuous fiction. -- Aneurin Bevan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
