Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales?
> >> 
> >> 2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1
> > 
> > No. Glibc-2.4-r1 used .utf8 locales.
> 
> That might be. Then I wonder, why I had no problems with .UTF-8
> when I was using 2.4-r1. As I wrote, it might be, that my system
> was misbehaving, as it accepted .UTF-8 just fine.

I'm afraid I got no idea about it.. Anyway have you changed your locale
settings from .UTF-8 to .utf8 (all environment variables etc.,)? Is your
system working fine now?

Farhan Ahmed
-- 
Place           :  Bangalore, Karnataka, India
GPG Key         :  8BE90E98
WengoPhone ID   :  farhanahmed
IRC Nick        :  farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net)

Attachment: pgpzg9wZabYT2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to