On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:00 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote: > On 5/25/06, Thomas Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It takes about as long to start going as it does to open the archive > > > /portage-20060123.tar.bz2 - conincidence? I think not! > > > > I think so ;) > > If it's not, then I really need to ask why on earth portage takes so > long to just index and search packages that took apt-get much less > time to work with. In defence of portage, I estimate there are 11229 packages that portage has to search through descriptions, dependencies, masks, etc: $ cd /usr/portage; find . -maxdepth 2 -mindepth 1 -type d | wc -l 11229 does apt-get really search this many packages? > I don't think it should be this slow. And I don't think I should have this little money :) But seriously, I think you trade off speed when searching, vs speed when syncing, vs keeping a database up to date. As already mentioned, there are other tools to help speed it up. Also, On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:45 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote: > > I also get the bonehead award: there was a new kernel sitting on my > hard drive and just yesterday I found and installed it. It was > remarkably easy to install! I loaded the configuration file from my > old kernel and then just make && make install and it worked! I didn't > even have to edit /boot/grub/menu.lst! Are you sure you're running it if you didn't have to edit grub? Does `uname -r` agree with the new version you just installed? cya, -- Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> A jury consists of twelve persons chosen to decide who has the better lawyer. -- Robert Frost -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list