"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hrm, these are really not sane. -march is telling gcc to build C code > that will only run on a p4, and then you have -mtune specifying to run > on everything back to a pentium-II. I *think* -march takes precedence > here....
Does it? I would have thought that having both -march and -mtune would be valid, but normally would be other way round by having, for example, '-march=i686 -mtune=pentium4' to build code which will run on a pentium-II or later but optimised for running on a P4. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
