Hi Richard On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:07:36 -0700 "Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/30/06, Andreas Schoelver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all > > > > each world update either updates or downgrades neon depending > > on the version just installed at that moment. > > It is a _very_ long-standing bug in portage that doesn't deal with > some dependancy situtations very well. [1] > > The answer is usually to mask the newer version. > > echo "# required by rapidsvn-0.9.0-r1" >>/etc/portage/package.mask > echo ">=net-misc/neon-0.24.7" >>/etc/portage/package.mask Sounds good, ... but: I performed a revdep-rebuild in between which did the downgrade of neon to 0.24.7, but the remerge of rapidsvn failed then. ---8<--- from the err output: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.6/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: warning: libneon.so.26, needed by /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so: undefined reference to `ne_get_content_type' /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so: undefined reference to `ne_get_response_header' /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so: undefined reference to `ne_has_support' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [rapidsvn] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 !!! ERROR: dev-util/rapidsvn-0.9.0-r1 failed. ---8<--- I now read that rapisvn-0.9.0-r1 depends on the newer version of neon. Is that correct? My portage tree is in sync concerning neon and rapidsvn. Maybe I have to find out how to fix the ebuild of rapidsvn to make it build on my system. Andreas -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
