Le Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:20:07 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse a écrit : > Hi, > > On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:58:33 +0200 gwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Someone has the same problem or an solution to solve this leak of >> memory? Thank you very much. > > You should at least describe the problem you have. You're just > describing the things you've tried to nail it down, but what are the > symptoms? What makes you think there's a memory leak in your program? > > -hwh I'm sorry I post only the end of log file of valgrind (the entire file is very big ~22500 lines). This is the result of execute the source code : ==13767== LEAK SUMMARY: ==13767== definitely lost: 36 bytes in 1 blocks. ==13767== indirectly lost: 120 bytes in 10 blocks. ==13767== possibly lost: 40,264 bytes in 47 blocks. ==13767== still reachable: 118,673 bytes in 1,963 blocks. ==13767== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. --13767-- memcheck: sanity checks: 59 cheap, 3 expensive --13767-- memcheck: auxmaps: 0 auxmap entries (0k, 0M) in use --13767-- memcheck: auxmaps: 0 searches, 0 comparisons --13767-- memcheck: secondaries: 53 issued (3392k, 3M) --13767-- memcheck: secondaries: 115 accessible and distinguished (7360k, 7M) --13767-- tt/tc: 46,665 tt lookups requiring 56,738 probes --13767-- tt/tc: 46,665 fast-cache updates, 8 flushes --13767-- translate: new 19,998 (425,678 -> 6,983,632; ratio 164:10) [0 scs] --13767-- translate: dumped 0 (0 -> ??) --13767-- translate: discarded 209 (3,781 -> ??) --13767-- scheduler: 2,984,389 jumps (bb entries). --13767-- scheduler: 59/33,828 major/minor sched events. --13767-- sanity: 60 cheap, 3 expensive checks. --13767-- exectx: 30,011 lists, 4,057 contexts (avg 0 per list) --13767-- exectx: 6,894 searches, 3,112 full compares (451 per 1000) --13767-- exectx: 0 cmp2, 196 cmp4, 1,062,968 cmpAll
-- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
