On Thursday 04 January 2007 01:49, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] I want my xmms':
> Incidentally, I just did a similar comparison on my machine between
> audacious and amarok, and found that amarok consistently uses at least
> 2.2 times the amount of memory that audacious does. And I've never
> heard anyone call amarok a resource-hog.

While I am a proud amaroK user, it does tend toward being resource-heavy 
and do-everything.  [But, with my "monster" system, that's what I 
like. :)]

-- 
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: pgpPMNkO4ia8t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to