On Wednesday 10 January 2007 01:40, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 00:29, Mick wrote:
> > # gcc-config -l
> >  [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5
> [SNIP]
>
> > --- Couldn't find 'gcc-3.4.5' to unmerge.
> [SNIP]
>
> > If it doesn't exist, why is it listed?  There's most likely a good
> > explanation for this, but it's getting late and I must be too tired to
> > understand it. Could you please care to explain?
>
> Maybe you have gcc-3.4.5-r1 ? `equery list -e gcc` will tell you.

Thank you.  equery only lists the latest gcc:
========================================
# equery list -e gcc
[ Searching for package 'gcc' in all categories among: ]
 * installed packages
[I--] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3 (4.1)
========================================

Under /etc/env.d/gcc I see the same that gcc-config -l shows:
========================================
# ls -la /etc/env.d/gcc
total 29
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 368 Jan  9 20:17 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 888 Jan  9 20:19 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  32 Jan  9 20:17 config
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 292 Mar 30  2006 i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 356 Mar 30  2006 i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardened
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 361 Mar 30  2006 i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednopie
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 364 Mar 30  2006 
i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednopiessp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 361 Mar 30  2006 i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.5-hardenednossp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 292 Jan  9 20:17 i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1
========================================

I think I'm sure it's not installed:
========================================
# equery list -i --full-regex 'gcc-3.4.*'
[ Searching for package 'gcc-3.4.*' in all categories among: ]
 * installed packages
#
========================================

I haven't remerged system or world, because this was a minor update from:

  Wed Nov 15 19:22:39 2006 >>> sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r1

to:

  Tue Jan  9 20:18:55 2007 >>> sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3

I notice that there are no hardened 3.4.1 packages, but don't know if it is 
relevant.  Any more ideas?
-- 
Regards,
Mick

Attachment: pgp3t9NiJo5TX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to