On Friday 16 February 2007 09:19:11 brullo nulla wrote:
> Ok. Now the question is: is the new dbus really installable indeed? I
> think "yes" from your explanation, but I want to be triple-sure.

Of course. You showed that when you provided `emerge -pv dbus` (it didn't say 
masked by anything)...

> (In fact, a self-blocking packages looked very odd to me, but...)
> (and why has been 0.62-r2 been hard masked so fast?)

What is often referred to as hard masked isn't the same as masked by missing 
keyword. Also it wasn't *that* fast. But short answer: because the maintainer 
doesn't want to maintain old software...

-- 
Bo Andresen

Attachment: pgpW5A4e9hjg4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to