On Friday 16 February 2007 09:19:11 brullo nulla wrote: > Ok. Now the question is: is the new dbus really installable indeed? I > think "yes" from your explanation, but I want to be triple-sure.
Of course. You showed that when you provided `emerge -pv dbus` (it didn't say masked by anything)... > (In fact, a self-blocking packages looked very odd to me, but...) > (and why has been 0.62-r2 been hard masked so fast?) What is often referred to as hard masked isn't the same as masked by missing keyword. Also it wasn't *that* fast. But short answer: because the maintainer doesn't want to maintain old software... -- Bo Andresen
pgpW5A4e9hjg4.pgp
Description: PGP signature