On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:12:07 +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote: > I've googled for hours as well, but I have no clues but one: Enabling > support for the PCI IDE/PATA Controller apparently pushes the device > names for the on-board IDE/PATA controller (e.g. /d_ev/hdd becomes > /dev/hdh). > > Is that even possible? That the extra PCI ATA-Controller takes > precedence over the on-board Controller?
There is a kind of logic to that; if you fit a bootable PCI controller, there's a good chance you want to boot from it, so it appears first. If your root partition is not on this controller's disks, you can compile the driver as a module, then /dev/hd[a-d] will already be allocated to the onboard controller before it is loaded. -- Neil Bothwick Never ask a geek why, just nod your head and slowly back away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature