On Saturday 05 May 2007, "Marko Kocić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] Wesnoth version': > Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development > versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)? > > I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2) > are pretty stable, so I can't see a reason why are not included in > "~x86". As for "x86", 1.2.4 (latest stable) seems ok. > > Should I open a bug for that?
Yeah, a new numbered release deserves it's own ebuild, even if it has to linger in package.mask. Make sure it's been 2-3 days after the release and then file a version bump bug. Please report if "simply renaming" the existing ebuild works and/or what you had to change to get a clean compile/install. If you follow Wesnoth closely, but aren't part of upstream, you might consider becoming a/the gentoo package maintainer for it. IIRC, IMHO, the packaging for Wesnoth could use a little "love". -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
